A posh bakkie is the intention, bringing a little ‘Benz class to the bakkie market, giving the owner/operator an option with a three-pointed star. Plus, bakkies are about as ‘lifestyle’ as it gets, but they tend to lack the niceties that many cash-rich lifestylers actually want these days; the X-Class aims to roll all of it up into one multi-purpose, lycra-ready package.
So it’s a new niche for Merc, then?
Well, not quite. One, Mercedes makes some of the best commercial vehicles in the world, so doing a rufty-tufty vehicle really isn’t new to it. Two, this isn’t actually a Mercedes one-off: the X-Class shares its basic bits with both the new Nissan Navara and Renault Alaskan, making it a co-production seeking a defined identity. Basically, it gets the same (initially) doublecab and four-wheel drive system, double wishbone front suspension and multi-link rear and pair of 2.3-litre, four-pot diesels in either 120kW/403Nm (X220d) or 140kW/450Nm (X250d) formats, the latter getting a twin-stage turbo instead of the mono in the former. There’s a V6 diesel coming with 190kW, but more on that in a bit. There are three model lines – Pure, Progressive and Power – with the X220d getting a six-speed manual in Pure or Progressive, the rest equipped with a seven-speed auto.
So how do you make a Mercedes feel like a Mercedes?
Obvious stuff first – you put a huge three-pointed star on the grille and give it a re-style. And yes, the X-Class looks neat, clean and good-looking. No, it’s not disguising the fact that its the same basic format as every other bakkie on the market, but there’s a good looking basic truck here. The rear is obviously more generic – there’s only so much you can do with a slab tailgate and tweaks to the rear lights – but the front works well, and with the right options and colours, it looks pretty good.
Inside, it gets even more Merc-ified, with a broad swathe of dash material (in our case a really rather nice unvarnished dark plank of tree), topped by the usual floating Mercedes infotainment screen and peppered with ‘X’ styled airvents. The media is handled by Merc’s ‘Audio 20’ system with a 7in screen and rotary controller, with the optional COMAND Online gubbins available as an option.There are a lot of options, so go careful with the configurator, or you’ll be staring at one very expensive bakkie.
There’s a traditional centre-console-mounted gear selector and handbrake, and you can’t help feeling that if this were a ground-up Merc product, that the more usual column-mounted Mercedes shifter and electronic handbrake would free up an extraordinary amount of space between the seats. To be fair though, there’s been a fair bit of work here, because the X-Class is actually 50mm wider in the cabin (and 70mm in the bed) than the Navara on which it’s based. It also gets a touch more headroom in the rear, and several tweaks to the ergonomics (there’s better padding in the rear seats) and more aggressive sound-deadening.
Still, so far so good – if you’d dropped into a Power-specced X without looking at the outside, you’d probably just assume you’d been inveigled into one of the twelvety-thousand SUV variants that Mercedes Benz currently offers. No bad thing.
What about the driving?
Here’s where it gets interesting. Mercedes says that it’s changed everything that the customer comes into contact with – meaning that it’s improved everything from ride-quality to NVH – and as soon as you get moving, you notice two things: first, it’s genuinely quiet, and secondly that it rides very well for a bakkie truck. Now usually, a bakkie has to be sprung to cope with everything from a bare bed to a full tonne payload, and subsequently feels harsh when there’s nothing in the back. The X-Class copes admirably with no ride-settling load, and actually rides as well as some SUVs. This is good. No, it’s not a magic carpet, and you’ll still get some chassis-shudder and bobble on wonky potholes and expansion joints, but it’s the best bakkie for ride quality I’ve driven in a while – helped in part by being extremely quiet. Yep, you’ll notice this is one solidly soundproofed effort, which goes a long way to making it feel more like the premium machine it wants you to think it is. It’s not as long-journey lightly knackering as most other cars in this part of the market, and that’s hugely appealing if this were to be your only vehicle. The steering is light, braking is effective, handling is on par-slash-good for this sector. It’s a bakkie – basic physics still apply.
What about the engine?
Here’s where it goes a bit wobbly. Bluntly, the X-Class struggles with the four-cylinder engine and auto ‘box. We tested the car at altitude in the mountains of Chile (more on that soon), but even without the inherent breathlessness of height, even the 140kW/450Nm Power-specced car we had was woefully slow to react. Initial pull away is fine, but if you want to overtake, you best plan, submit an application and wait. Seriously, kickdown accounted for a two-elephant count before anything happened, and even then you aren’t exactly subjected to forceful acceleration. Worse, given this is a car that Merc is pitching as a ‘high-end variant for urban lifestyles’, the lack of reaction makes it an absolute bus to try and weave through town. Noise well-smothered, yes, but it comes with a feeling that there’s no guts to match the macho exterior.
Now, in answer to this chink in the X-Class armoury, we also managed a passenger ride in the forthcoming (middle of 2018) diesel V6 with 190kW/550Nm and a lump more torque – the X350d – and that also gets a full Mercedes transmission. A car which answers all of these questions and more, and transforms the X-Class into a full-house ‘proper’ Merc product. If you want the all-round Mercedes experience, then there’s really only one engine option. You’ll be left underwhelmed otherwise. Mind you, I’m not expecting that set-up to be the budget option.
Can it off-road?
Yep. Light-to-medium off-road is easy-peasy, helped by the multi-link rear end and decent clearances. As usual, you’ll be more limited by tyre-type than the car’s inherent 4×4 ability, though I would suggest that if you’re traversing muddy fields regularly that you option the rear diff lock and the 20mm ride-height increase. You can switch to all-wheel drive on the fly, and everything’s simple enough to use via a rotary switch on the centre console. If you get it wrong, there’s lots of safety kit, too, including a bouncy-castle’s-worth of airbags, active brake assist, lane-keep assist, hill start tech, a reversing cam and optional trailer stability assist for the towing of your lifestyle horse trailer or wood chipper, depending on what day it is.
So what’s the verdict?
Tough one this. I happen to think it looks better than either the Nissan Navara or Renault Alaskan with which it shares most of its guts. With a couple of light tweaks (bigger tyres, a decent roll bar, some extra lighting), it’d be a very good-looking machine. And there’s more appeal in saying that you have a Mercedes bakkie than either of the other two. It’s also relatively refined and comfortable, quiet and largely capable. But the current/initial engine and ‘box don’t back up the pitch well enough to warrant the Merc premium. Either wait for the V6, or go cheap and practical, and be prepared for a less posh badge.
So, a largely refined bakkie from Mercedes, with good looks and unusually cosseting refinement for the sector. Let down by sluggish engine and gearbox line-up.
Original content source partner: https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/x-class/first-drive